Fracking causing more harm than good essay

Christopher Bateman has come forth with the startling fact that these chemicals are "volatile organic compounds. All of the companies who engage in this particular behavior claim that their fracking proppant ratios are a trade secretand so there are a lot of regional differences between the companies and what is found in their fracking proppants.

The issues environmentalist has with fracking lies in the removal method. These are deemed secrets of the trade. According to the Energy Information Administration, shale gas plays, or fields, in the United States; most notably the Marcellus, in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and New York, and in Texas are said to contain enough natural gas to power the country for years Is Fracking a Good Idea?

The pumping produces a split shale so that the natural gas can flow. One need only recall the former federal agency in charge of collecting oil and gas royalties on public lands, the Minerals Management Service. Researchers at the Colorado School of Public Health, University of Coloradoanalyzed existing research of exposure to conventional petroleum hydrocarbons in occupational settings, and residences near refineries, in conjunction with known pollutants associated Fracking causing more harm than good essay fracking nonconventionalin order to assess health risks to those residents living near fracking operations.

The main concern that this writer believe both groups of American are there sufficient regulations now in place to ensure safety. Public opinion has been expressed as both fear of the unknown, and possible harm. Soil and Oil Spill Contamination: The spector of climate change makes the acclerated pursuit of carbon based fuel an irrational policy predicted to be far more expensive than the initial costs required to switch to clean energy technologies.

That leads to the main question that must be asked if fracking is to really be addressed and considered: They also are not required to reveal the chemical materials of the fluids they use in the fracking process. If your actions do not poison the water, accelerate climate change, cause cancer to those living near drilling and refineries, etc.

Due to the secretive nature of the drilling companies when it comes to the makeup of their methods they use, as well as how little research there is currently published on the topic, there is still much that is not known about fracking.

If effective environmental action is not taken today, the possible consequences from fracking will grow into a more serious problem. In the aftermath of the spill, ExxonMobil has disclosed that the pipeline has been transporting tar sands oil from Alberta, Canada, which is a low grade, more toxic and corrosive type of oil.

I have had some teaching on the fracking process and its potential risks, but feel that knowledge is incomplete. Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Engineering work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours.

Of the known chemicals associated with fracking, "at least half of the chemicals known to be present in fracking fluid are toxic, many of them are carcinogens, neurotoxins, endocrine disruptors, and mutagens.

For a pro-fracking--Fracking is crucial to global economic stability; the economic benefits outweigh the environmental risks, says Terry Engeldervs.

This increase in use has caused environmentalists to notice, and to start looking for research on whether or not the practice is safe. Researchers also found a potential explosion hazard with the related concentrations of methane.

The United States Department of Energy estimates that fracking will produce approximately 2. Each well produces millions of gallons of toxic fluid containing not only the added chemicals, but other naturally occurring radioactive material, liquid hydrocarbons, brine water and heavy metals.

Search our thousands of essays: That means they would be playing a losing and unsuccessful game. If these fluids remain far underground, they might not damage the human environment.

If a carbon tax were to be passed, energy companies would no longer get away with passing their so-called externalities pollution on to the community, tax payer, or environment.

Disposal of hydrofracking waste fluid by injection into subsurface aquifers triggers earthquake swarm in central Arkansas with potential for damaging earthquake Seismological Research Letters April83 2: For the companies, that is a good choice.

Fracking can be defined as a method to remove natural gas from the ground. This allows the petroleum product in the well to flow more easily, and more will flow from the well, resulting in more profit.

Prevention or Mitigation While many state agencies function more as facilitators of fossil energy development than regulators, federal guardians of public health are also vulnerable to 'getting into bed' with big business, literally.

There are many pros and cons to fracking.

Advancing the World, Together

They are multiple pros and cons for the American regarding the use hydraulic fracking. Because of that, fracking is looked at as being the only viably way to keep the profit in drilling. Impacts to local health and ecology are pitted against the national agenda to retain dependence on fossil energy.

The public has started to look more carefully at fracking, largely due to the increase in its use in wells all over the world.Methane is a main component of natural gas and is 25 times more potent in trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide.

A recent study by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) monitoring gas wells in Weld County, Colorado, estimated that 4 percent of the methane produced by these wells is escaping into the atmosphere.

Potential Health and Environmental Effects of Hydrofracking in the Williston Basin, Montana

Fracking: Causing More Harm Than Good Essay - If the question: “what hydraulic fracturing or fracking is?” was asked to the average person, depending on their location their answer could vary. Most likely though most or many people would not know what Fracking truly is but most would say that they have heard at least a little about it from.

As such, Christopher Bateman claims that "more than 90% of natural-gas wells today use fracking." Fracking and Safety Concerns Fracking, and more specifically fracking fluid, has lead the country into a huge debate regarding the safety of this practice.

This free Engineering essay on Essay: Fracking is perfect for Engineering students to use as an example. West Virginia, and New York, and in Texas are said to contain enough natural gas to power the country for years (Is Fracking a Good Idea?).

These chemicals have potential cancer-causing properties have been used in fracking. A peculiar question has arisen from the importance of technology, Does it cause more harm than good?

Free Engineering essays

Many people’s lives revolve around technology, more than billion people worldwide have some sort of Internet access (Digital Divide). Fracking Essays - Fracking: Causing More Harm Than Good.

Fracking causing more harm than good essay
Rated 5/5 based on 67 review